Reduced Level of Disclosure for Regulatory Offences that are Minor and Routine
R. v. Stinchcombe 1991 CanLII 45 (SCC), [1991] 68 C.C.C. (3d) 1 (S.C.C.) is the leading case regarding disclosure obligations on the part of the prosecution. It establishes that the prosecution shall disclose all relevant evidence within its possession. The obligation is very broad but not unlimited. In R. v. Collins , when discussing disclosure obligations in the regulatory offense context the court observed that, ... The vast majority of regulatory offences do not rise to this level of complexity, however. Some regulatory offences are so simple, in fact, that they are classified as absolute liability offences. Others, including most 'traffic' violations are minor and routine. When one takes into account all bylaws created by delegated legislative authority to every municipality in the province, it is safe to conclude that the majority of regulatory offences are simple matters requiring effective but also efficient litigation processes. In the case of regul...