Memories Formed in Childhood But Recounted in Adulthood
The credibility of every
witness who testifies before the courts, and reliability of their evidence must
of course be carefully assessed but assessed using common sense that takes into
account the age of the witness when the alleged events occurred and the age of
the witness when testifying.
Since children may experience the world differently from adults, it is hardly surprising that details important to adults, like time and place, may be missing from their recollection.
Since children may experience the world differently from adults, it is hardly surprising that details important to adults, like time and place, may be missing from their recollection.
R. v. W. (R.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122.
Credibility
Generally, where an adult
testifies about events that occurred when she was a child, her credibility
should be assessed according to the criteria applicable to adult witnesses.
R. v. W.
(R.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122.
Yet with regard to her evidence pertaining to
events which occurred in childhood, the presence of inconsistencies,
particularly as to peripheral matters such as time and location, should be
considered in the context of the age of the witness at the time of the events
to which she is testifying.
R. v. W.
(R.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122; R. v. A.M., 2014 ONCA 769 (CanLII), at para. 11.
A “central inconsistency”
in the testimony of an adult witness about a childhood event, however, cannot
be approached with the same latitude as a peripheral inconsistency.
Reliability
The issue of the
reliability of a complainant’s evidence is heightened where the complainant
testifies to events she alleges occurred several decades before, when she was a
young child.
R. v.
A.N.,
2017 ONCA 647 (CanLII), at para.
17 [alleged incidents occurring 33 years prior].
Stuart
O’Connell, O’Connell Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca
Comments
Post a Comment