Gladue Hearings: Systemic or Background Factors
When
sentencing an Aboriginal offender, courts must consider:
(1) The unique systemic
or background factors which may have played a part in bringing the particular
aboriginal offender before the courts.
To do this courts are to take judicial notice of such matters as the
history of colonialism, displacement, and residential schools and how that
history continues to translate into lower educational attainment, lower
incomes, higher unemployment, higher rates of substance abuse and suicide, and
higher levels of incarceration for Aboriginal peoples. These matters
provide the necessary context for understanding and evaluating the case‑specific
information presented by counsel.
(2)
The types of sentencing procedures and sanctions which
may be appropriate in the circumstances for the offender because of his or her
particular Aboriginal heritage or connection.
R. v. Gladue,
1999 CanLII 679 (SCC), at para. 66.
Aboriginal Offender
not required to establish causal connection
It
is an error in principle for a sentencing judge, in assessing the first branch
of the Gladue framework, to require an
offender to establish a causal link between systemic and background factors and the commission of the offence.
R.
v. Ipeelee,
2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433.
R. v.
F.H.L.,
2018 ONCA 83, at para. 32;
R. v. Collins, 2011 ONCA 182, 104 O.R. (3d) 241, at paras. 32-33;
R. v. Kreko, 2016 ONCA 367, at paras. 20-21.
Such
a requirement displays an inadequate understanding of the devastating
intergenerational effects of the collective experiences of Aboriginal peoples
and imposes an evidentiary burden on offenders that was not intended by Gladue.
Ipeelee, at para. 82.
Stuart O’Connell, O’Connell Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca
Comments
Post a Comment