Fitness of Sentence and Appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada
Section 40(1)
of the Supreme Court Act provides that
an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada is to be
decided on the basis of the importance of the case.
This is
consistent with a core function of the Supreme Court of Canada: to settle
questions of law of national importance in the interests of promoting
uniformity in the application of the law across the country, especially with
respect to matters of federal competence.
To obtain leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada from a
sentence imposed, varied or affirmed by a provincial or territorial court of
appeal, an applicant must demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the court, that
the question raised, by reason of its public importance or the importance of
any issue of law or of mixed law and fact involved in that question, is one
that ought to be decided by that court or that it is, for any other reason, of
such a nature or significance as to warrant a decision by that court.
While the Supreme Court of Canada has jurisdiction under s. 40(1)
of the Supreme Court Act to assess the fitness of a sentence (that
is to say, the quantum of a sentence), as a matter of policy the Court has
decided, as a rule of its own making, that it should not do so. It deals with
principle, not fitness.
R. v. Boussoulas, 2018 ONCA 326,
at para. 15;
R. v. Gardiner (1982), 68 C.C.C (2d) 477 (S.C.C.), at pp. 506-507.
Supreme Court Act
Appeals with leave
of Supreme Court
40(1) Subject to subsection (3), an appeal lies to the Supreme Court
from any final or other judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal or of the
highest court of final resort in a province, or a judge thereof, in which
judgment can be had in the particular case sought to be appealed to the Supreme
Court, whether or not leave to appeal to the Supreme Court has been refused by
any other court, where, with respect to the particular case sought to be
appealed, the Supreme Court is of the opinion that any question involved
therein is, by reason of its public importance or the importance of any issue
of law or any issue of mixed law and fact involved in that question, one that
ought to be decided by the Supreme Court or is, for any other reason, of such a
nature or significance as to warrant decision by it, and leave to appeal from
that judgment is accordingly granted by the Supreme Court.
Stuart O’Connell, O’Connell Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca (All rights reserved to author).
Comments
Post a Comment