Sentencing of Youthful First Offenders for Serious Crimes
While
individual deterrence and rehabilitation are the primary objectives in sentencing
a first offender, the importance and weight of other factors increase with the
seriousness of the crime. This approach respects the fundamental principle of
sentencing stated in s. 718.2 of the Criminal Code: “a sentence must be
proportionate to the gravity of the offence and the degree of responsibility of
the offender".
R. v. Brown,
2015 ONCA 361
Generally
speaking, sentences imposed on young first offenders will stress individual deterrence,
where necessary, and rehabilitation. General deterrence will play little, if
any, role in fashioning the appropriate sentence in this category of offender
in most cases: R. v. Ijam (2007),
2007 ONCA 597 (CanLII), 87 O.R. (3d) 81 at 93-94 (C.A.).
Serious
crimes of violence, particularly sexual assaults, do provide an exception to
the general rule described above. While all of the principles of sentences
remain important, including rehabilitation, for serious crimes involving
significant personal violence, the objectives of denunciation and general
deterrence gain prominence: R. v. Ijam,
supra; R. v. Wells (2000), 2000 SCC 10
(CanLII), 141 C.C.C. (3d) 368 at para. 26 (S.C.C.).
The
emphasis to be placed on denunciation and to a lesser extent general
deterrence, grows with the seriousness of the particular circumstances
surrounding the sexual assault for which an accused, even a young accused, is
being sentenced.
Comments
Post a Comment