Tactical Decisions of Police Not to be Micromanaged by the Courts
Section 8 of the Charter
protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Among other things, for a
search to be constitutionally reasonable, it must be conducted in a reasonable
manner.
See
R. v. Collins, 1987 CanLII 84 (SCC),
at para. 23.
Point-in-time analysis
Police decisions about the
manner in which a search will be carried out fall to be adjudged by what was
or should reasonably have been known to them at the time the search was
conducted, and not through the lens of how things turned out to be.
Hindsight is not the measuring stick.
R. v. Rutledge, 2017 ONCA 635, at para. 25.
Police afforded some latitude in respect of tactical decisions
regarding a warrant-supported entry
Police are entitled to
some latitude on how they decide to enter premises under a warrant.
R. v. Rutledge, at para. 26.
In R. v. Rutledge, police used tear gas during the execution of a warrant, a substantial departure from the common law knock-and-announce rule,
and did not disclose an intention to use tear gas in their affidavit supporting
the application for a search warrant (ITO).
The Court of Appeal upheld
the reasonableness of the search, recognizing that the rights of a suspect do not exist
independently of the requirements of safe and effective law enforcement.
In an
assessment of the manner in which a search has been executed, a reviewing court
balances the rights of suspects, on the one hand, with the requirements of safe
and effective law enforcement, on the other. The trial judge did this. This is
no place for the Monday morning quarterback.
R. v. Rutledge, at para. 26.
Stuart O’Connell, O’Connell
Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca
Comments
Post a Comment