Voyeurism: Secret Recordings and Expectation of Privacy
To come within
the offence of voyeurism (section 162 of the Criminal Code), the
impugned observation or recording must be done surreptitiously. Also, the person
who is observed or recorded must be in circumstances that give rise to a
reasonable expectation of privacy.
In R. v. Jarvis, 2017 ONCA 778 the Court of Appeal for Ontario, applying principles of statutory interpretation [FN], held that for the purposes of the voyeurism offence the reasonable expectation of privacy of the person being secretly stared at or videoed does not include a reasonable expectation that she/he not be surreptitiously recorded or observed.
Given Huscroft J.A’s cogent dissent, I imagine that this proposition may find itself tested at the Supreme Court of Canada.
In R. v. Jarvis, 2017 ONCA 778 the Court of Appeal for Ontario, applying principles of statutory interpretation [FN], held that for the purposes of the voyeurism offence the reasonable expectation of privacy of the person being secretly stared at or videoed does not include a reasonable expectation that she/he not be surreptitiously recorded or observed.
If the fact that they are being
surreptitiously recorded without their consent for a sexual purpose were enough
to give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, that would make the
privacy requirement redundant (at para. 108).
Given Huscroft J.A’s cogent dissent, I imagine that this proposition may find itself tested at the Supreme Court of Canada.
Criminal Code
162(1) Every one commits
an offence who, surreptitiously, observes – including by mechanical or
electronic means – or makes a visual recording of a person who is in
circumstances that give rise to a reasonable expectation of privacy, if
(a) the person is in a
place in which a person can reasonably be expected to be nude, to expose his or
her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or to be engaged in explicit
sexual activity;
(b) the person is nude, is
exposing his or her genital organs or anal region or her breasts, or is engaged
in explicit sexual activity, and the observation or recording is done for the
purpose of observing or recording a person in such a state or engaged in such
activity; or
(c) the observation or
recording is done for a sexual purpose.
[FN] Specifically, the
common law presumption that Parliament does not speak in vain: although a statute may be redundant, the contrary is presumed.
Comments
Post a Comment