Extrapolating Dangerous Driving from the Fact an Accident Occurred
Both the mens rea
and actus reus of the offence of dangerous driving focus on the manner of the accused’s driving.
The consequences of the
accused’s driving should not be used in determining whether the manner of
driving was dangerous (actus reus of
dangerous operation of motor vehicle) or in marked departure from the standard
of care of a reasonably prudent person in the circumstances (mens rea of dangerous operation of motor
vehicle).
R. v. Romano, 2017 ONCA 837, at paras. 46, 68, 69, 71.
Previously it was clear
that consequences of the accused’s driving (such as an accident) should not be
used to determine if the manner of driving was objectively dangerous to the
public (actus reus).
R. v. Roy, [2012] 2 SCR 60, 2012 SCC 26 (CanLII), at para. 34. .
R. v. Roy, [2012] 2 SCR 60, 2012 SCC 26 (CanLII), at para. 34. .
In the recent decision
of R. v. Romano, the Court of Appeal
for Ontario makes it clear that it is also an error to use the
consequences of the accused’s driving in determining whether the manner of driving
constituted a marked departure from the norm (mens rea).
Stuart
O’Connell, O’Connell Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca
Comments
Post a Comment