Presumptions: The Honesty of Witnesses is not Presumed

The law recognizes no presumption of honesty among witnesses summoned to testify in a criminal trial.


R. v. Luciano, 2011 ONCA 89 (CanLII), at para. 147. 


The evidence of each witness is to be assessed in the light of the totality of the evidence without any presumptions except the general and over-riding presumption of innocence.

R. v. Thain (2009), 2009 ONCA 223 (CanLII), 243 C.C.C. (3d) 230 (Ont. C.A.), at para. 32.

Stuart O'Connell, O'Connell Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Curative Proviso : When Being Wrong Doesn't Matter

Section 686(1)(b)(iii) (the “curative proviso”) of the Criminal Code permits an appellate court to uphold a conviction despite error of law committed by the trial judge where that error has not led to a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice.  The “ curative proviso ” is to be applied only in those cases where the outcome of the trial, irrespective of the error, would necessarily have been the same. Colpitts v. The Queen , 1965 CanLII 2 (SCC), [1965] S.C.R. 739 ).  The onus of establishing that this high standard is met is on the Crown. R. v. Jolivet , 2000 SCC 29 (CanLII), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 751 ; R. v. Khan , 2001 SCC 86 (CanLII), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 823 ; R. v. Van , 2009 SCC 22 (CanLII), [2009] 1 S.C.R. 716 . The curative proviso may be applied, according to its modern interpretation, where the Crown can establish on a balance of probabilities that the legal error is harmless, in the sense that no prejudice has resulted, or that, despite any preju...
Read more

Police Powers: Random Vehicle Stops

Random Vehicle Stops under the HTA The Highway Traffic Act of Ontario (specifically, section 216(1)) of the Act) allows a police officer to stop a motor vehicle even in the absence of a reasonable suspicion of an offence having been committed providing it is done for the purpose of general traffic regulation such as checking for a valid driver’s license and insurance, mechanical fitness of the vehicle and the sobriety of the driver. In short, there is a statutory basis for police to stop vehicles for the purpose of highway regulation and safety, even where the stops are random. Brown v. Durham , at para. 21; R. v. Ladouceur , [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257, at p. 1288; R. v. Simpson (1993), 79 C.C.C. (3d) 482 (Ont. C.A.), at p. 492. Equivalent legislation in Canada’s other provinces provides likewise. See, for instance, section 201.1 of Newfoundland and Labrador’s Highway Traffic Act , R.S.N.L. 1990, c. H-3, and British Columbia’s Motor Vehicle Act, [RSBC 1996] Chap...
Read more

Disclosure of Third Party Records Under the O’Connor Regime

The O’Connor framework addresses the right of an accused to obtain documents that are in the hands of third parties. In view of the privacy interests at stake, an accused bears the burden of demonstrating that the documents sought are “logically probative to an issue at trial or the competence of a witness to testify ”: R. v. O’Connor , 1995 CanLII 51 (SCC), [1995] 4 S.C.R. 411 , at para. 22 (emphasis in original). An O’Connor application is a two-step process. At the first step, an accused must demonstrate that the records sought are likely relevant to an issue at trial, such as the credibility or reliability of a witness. If an accused meets the likely relevance threshold, the documents will be produced to the trial judge, who must then weigh the “salutary and deleterious effects of a production order and determine whether a non-production order would constitute a reasonable limit on the ability of the accused to make full answer and defence” ( O’Connor , at para. 30). This p...
Read more