Do Government Officials Have Benefit of the Defence of Officially-Induced Error?
The defence
of officially induced error of law is intended to protect a diligent person who
first questions a government authority about the interpretation of legislation
so as to be sure to comply with it and then is prosecuted by the same
government for acting in accordance with the interpretation the authority gave
him or her.
The conditions under which this defence is available
are well-established.
See Lévis (City) v. Tétreault, 2006 SCC 12, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 420.
Whether a
government official can use the defence of officially induced error of law in
relation to the performance of his/her duties remains an open question;
however, the Supreme Court of Canada, in
obiter, expressed “serious reservations” about allowing the defence to
extend to government actors.
R. v. Bédard, 2017 SCC 4
Comments
Post a Comment