Applying the Jordan Framework When the Delay is Below the Presumptive Ceiling
Timely
justice is one of the hallmarks of a free and democratic society. In the
criminal law context, it takes on special significance. Section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms attests to this, in that it
guarantees the right of accused persons “to be tried within a reasonable time”.
The doctrinal framework for the right to be tried within a reasonable time is set out in R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27.
The doctrinal framework for the right to be tried within a reasonable time is set out in R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27.
Under the
Jordan framework, where the
delay falls below the presumptive ceiling of 18 months (for cases
going to trial in the provincial court), the
onus is on the defence to show the delay was unreasonable. The defence must
show:
(i)
it took
meaningful steps that demonstrate a sustained effort to expedite the
proceedings (defence initiative); and
(ii)
that the
case took markedly longer than it reasonably should have: Jordan, at para. 82 (reasonable
time requirement).
In
transitional cases, the two aforementioned criteria are to be applied
contextually, with consideration given to the parties’ reliance on the previous
state of the law: Jordan, at
para. 99.
As the
Supreme Court noted in Jordan, stays
beneath the presumptive ceiling are expected to be rare.
Defence
Initiative — Meaningful and Sustained Steps
It falls to the defence to show
that
·
it attempted to set the earliest possible hearing
dates,
·
was cooperative with and responsive to the Crown
and the court,
·
put the Crown on timely notice when delay was
becoming a problem, and
·
conducted all applications (including the s. 11(b) application) reasonably
and expeditiously.
Reasonable
Time Requirements of the Case — Time Markedly Exceeded
The reasonable time requirements
of a case derive from a variety of factors, including
·
the
complexity of the case
o
all other factors being equal, the more
complicated a case, the longer it will take counsel to prepare for trial and
for the trial to be conducted once it begins.
·
local
considerations
o
In considering the reasonable time requirements of
the case, trial judges should also employ the knowledge they have of their own
jurisdiction, including how long a case of that nature typically takes to get
to trial in light of the relevant local and systemic circumstances.
·
whether
the Crown took reasonable steps to expedite the proceedings.
.
Comments
Post a Comment