Leave to Appeal from a Decision of a Summary Conviction Appeal Judge: Don't Get Stopped at the Door
In summary conviction appeal
proceedings, the Superior Court of Justice is the primary appellate
court. Access to the Court of Appeal from these decisions of the Superior Court is
restricted to questions of law alone and only if leave to appeal is
granted (see s. 839, Criminal Code).
Such
appeals are appeals from
the decision of the summary conviction appeal judge and are not a second appeal
from the trial decision.
The test for obtaining leave to appeal under s. 839 of the Criminal Code is exacting. As
the Court of Appeal for Ontario held in R. v.
R.R. (2008), 90 O.R. (3d) 641
(C.A.), at para. 32:
Leave to appeal may be granted where the merits of the
proposed question of law are arguable, even if not strong, and the proposed
question of law has significance to the administration of justice beyond the
four corners of the case. Leave to appeal may also be granted where there
appears to be a clear error even if it cannot be said that the error has
significance to the administration of justice beyond the specific case.
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has made it clear that it is not enough that an appeal raises a question of
law. Appeal counsel should
frame their applications for leave to appeal accordingly. Counsel arguing the application of settled law to a particular case will generally get stopped at the door, so to speak.
See for instance, R. v. Nield, 2017 ONCA 722 (leave to
appeal denied);
Stuart O’Connell, O’Connell
Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca
Comments
Post a Comment