Rape Shield Provisions: Evidence that the Sexual Relationship Continued Past the Date of the Alleged Assault
Section
276(2) of the Criminal Code provides that evidence that a complainant engaged
in sexual activity with the accused or anyone else, other than the sexual
activity alleged in the charge (other sexual activity), is inadmissible at the
instance of the accused, regardless of the purpose for which it is tendered,
unless the accused meets the three criteria set down in s. 276(2). The
evidence of other sexual activity must be:
· evidence of specific
instances of sexual activity (s. 276(2)(a));
· relevant to an issue at
trial (s. 276(2)(b)); and
· have “significant
probative value that is not substantially outweighed by the danger of prejudice
to the proper administration of justice” (s. 276(2)(c)).
Relevant
to an Issue at Trial
Evidence
that the relationship between the complainant and the accused, including the
sexual component of the relationship, carried on as it had before the alleged
assault may be relevant to whether the assault occurred, where the defence takes
the position that the parties carried on as if nothing had happened because
nothing had in fact happened.
R. v. L.S., 2017 ONCA 685
Evidence
does not have to establish or refute a fact in issue to be relevant; it need
only, as a matter of common sense and human experience, have some tendency to
make the existence or non-existence of that material fact more or less
likely. There is a big difference between evidence that is relevant and
evidence that is determinative: see R. v. A. (No. 2), [2001] 2
W.L.R. 1546, at para. 31 (H.C.). Evidence that the relationship continued
as before is far from determinative of whether the assault occurred, but it may
be relevant.
R. v. L.S., 2017 ONCA 685, at
para. 89.
Stuart O’Connell, O’Connell Law Group, www.leadersinlaw.ca
Comments
Post a Comment