Sentencing Ranges
Sentencing ranges are nothing
more than summaries of the minimum and maximum sentences imposed in the past,
which serve in any given case as guides for the application of all the relevant
principles and objectives. However, they should not be considered “averages”,
let alone straightjackets, but should instead be seen as historical portraits
for the use of sentencing judges, who must still exercise their discretion in
each case.
There will always be
situations that call for a sentence outside a particular range: although
ensuring parity in sentencing is itself a desirable objective, the fact that
each crime is committed in unique circumstances by an offender with a unique
profile cannot be disregarded. The determination of a just and appropriate
sentence is a highly individualized exercise that goes beyond a purely
mathematical equation. It involves a variety of facts that are difficult to define
with precision. This is why it may happen that a sentence that, on itself face,
falls outside a particular range, and that may never have been imposed in the
past for a similar crime, is not demonstrably unfit. Everything depends on the
gravity of the offence, the offender’s degree of responsibility and the
specific circumstances.
R. v. Lacasse, 2015
SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089, at paras 57,58.
Comments
Post a Comment