Loss of Memory is Direct Evidence of Nothing, but may be Circumstantial Evidence of Much
The significance of lack of memory was
discussed in R. v. J.R., 2006 CanLII 22658 (ON SC), [2006] O.J. No. 2698
(S.C.J.):
...Absent expert evidence, a loss of
memory or a ‘blackout’ is direct evidence of nothing except the fact that the
witness cannot testify as to what happened during a particular period. Indeed,
Ms. Martin the toxicologist called by the Crown described a blackout as, “a
complete loss of memory for a portion of time during a drinking episode.” In a
sexual assault case this is particularly unfortunate since, as was noted in R.
v. Esau (1997), 1997 CanLII 312 (SCC), 116 C.C.C. (3d) 289 at 296 (S.C.C.),
‘[t] he parties testimony is usually the most important evidence in sexual
assault cases.” Esau is particularly relevant to the case at bar because
it is a sexual assault case involving a complainant with no memory of the
relevant time. In Esau at 297, Justice Major said of the complainant's
memory loss, “[a]ny number of things may have happened during the period in
which she had no memory.” Thus, the
only significance of memory loss, without more, is that the complainant cannot
give direct evidence as to whether or not she consented to the sexual contact
or whether or not she had the capacity to do so [emphasis mine] (para.
18).
However,
the
absence of evidence of consent or lack thereof due to the impact of alcohol on
a complainant’s memory is not necessarily fatal to the prosecution –
“It may well be circumstantial evidence
which, when considered with other evidence in a case, may permit inferences to
be drawn about whether or not a complainant did or did not consent or whether
she was or was not capable of consenting at the relevant time.”
R.
v. J.R., at para. 20.
See also R. v. C.P., 2017 ONCJ 277 (CanLII), at
para. 103 &104, where the fact that the complainant fell asleep or passed
out was circumstantial evidence that allowed the court to draw certain
inferences about her level of intoxication and her capacity/incapacity to consent
to the sexual activity that had occurred.
Stuart O'Connell, O'Connell Law Group (leadersinlaw.ca).
Stuart O'Connell, O'Connell Law Group (leadersinlaw.ca).
Comments
Post a Comment